TClarke
Annual Report and Financial Statements 2021
64
65
Governance
misstated. If we identify an apparent material inconsistency
or material misstatement, we are r
equired to perform
procedur
es to conclude whether there is a material
misstatement of the financial statements or a material
misstatement of the other information. If, based on the work
we have performed, we conclude that there is a material
misstatement of this other information, we are requir
ed to
report that fact. W
e have nothing to report based on these
responsibilities.
With respect to the Strategic Report and Directors’ Report,
we also considered whether the disclosur
es requir
ed by the
UK Companies Act 2006 have been included.
Based on our work undertaken in the course of the audit, the
Companies Act 2006 requir
es us also to report certain
opinions and matters as described below
.
Strategic Report and Directors’ Report
In our opinion, based on the work undertaken in the course
of the audit, the information given in the Strategic Report and
Directors’ Report for the year ended 31 December 2021 is
consistent with the financial statements and has been prepar
ed
in accordance with applicable legal r
equirements.
In light of the knowledge and understanding of the Group and
Company and their environment obtained in the course of the
audit, we did not identify any material misstatements in the
Strategic Report and Directors’ Report.
Directors’ Remuneration
In our opinion, the part of the Annual Report on Remuneration
to be audited has been properly pr
epared in accor
dance with
the Companies Act 2006.
Corporate governance statement
The Listing Rules requir
e us to review the dir
ectors’ statements
in relation to going concern, longer
-ter
m viability and that part
of the corporate governance statement relating to the
Company’
s compliance with the provisions of the UK Corporate
Governance Code specified for our review
. Our additional
responsibilities with r
espect to the corporate governance
statement as other information are described in the Reporting
on other information section of this report.
Based on the work undertaken as part of our audit, we have
concluded that each of the following elements of the corporate
governance statement, included within the Statement of
Compliance is materially consistent with the financial statements
and our knowledge obtained during the audit, and we have
nothing material to add or draw attention to in relation to:
•
The directors’ confirmation that they have carried out a robust
assessment of the emerging and principal risks;
•
The disclosures in the Annual Report that describe those
principal risks, what procedures ar
e in place to identify
emerging risks and an explanation of how these are being
•
The directors’ statement in the financial statements about
whether they considered it appropriate to adopt the going
concer
n basis of accounting in preparing them, and their
identification of any material uncertainties to the Group’
s and
Company’
s ability to continue to do so over a period of at
least twelve months from the date of approval of the financial
statements;
•
The directors’ explanation as to their assessment of the
Group’
s and Company’
s prospects, the period this assessment
covers and why the period is appropriate; and
•
The directors’ statement as to whether they have a reasonable
expectation that the Company will be able to continue in
operation and meet its liabilities as they fall due over the
period of its assessment, including any related disclosures
drawing attention to any necessary qualifications or
assumptions.
Our review of the dir
ectors’ statement regar
ding the
longer
-ter
m viability of the Gr
oup was substantially less in scope
than an audit and only consisted of making inquiries and
considering the directors’ pr
ocess supporting their statement;
checking that the statement is in alignment with the relevant
provisions of the UK Corporate Governance Code; and con
-
sidering whether the statement is consistent with the financial
statements and our knowledge and understanding of the Group
and Company and their environment obtained in the course of
the audit.
In addition, based on the work undertaken as part of our audit,
we have concluded that each of the following elements of the
corporate governance statement is materially consistent with the
financial statements and our knowledge obtained during
the audit:
•
The directors’ statement that they consider the Annual
Report, taken as a whole, is fair
, balanced and
understandable, and provides the information necessary for
the members to assess the Group’
s and Company’
s position,
perfor
mance, business model and strategy;
•
The section of the Annual Report that describes the review of
effectiveness of risk management and internal control
•
The section of the Annual Report describing the work of the
We have nothing to r
eport in respect of our r
esponsibility to
report when the dir
ectors’ statement relating to the Company’
s
compliance with the Code does not properly disclose a
departure fr
om a relevant pr
ovision of the Code specified under
the Listing Rules for review by the auditors.
Financial statements - Group
Financial statements - Company
Based on our professional judgement, we determined materiality for the financial statements as a whole as follows:
£1,635,000 (2020: £1,483,000).
0.5% of revenue (2020: 0.5% of average r
evenue for the last
We used r
evenue as a basis for materiality as the Group’
s
profit mar
gins have historically been low
, consistent with the
industry as a whole, and therefor
e revenue is used by the
Group as a key performance indicator
.
Overall materiality
How we
determined it
Rationale for
benchmark applied
£634,000 (2020: £625,000).
1% of total assets (2020: 0.9% of
total assets)
We used total assets as a basis for
materiality as the Company does not
trade and we believe that total assets
is therefor
e the most appropriate
Independent Auditors‘ Report to the Members of TClarke PLC
Report on the Audit of the Financial Statements
For each component in the scope of our group audit, we
allocated a materiality that is less than our overall group
materiality
. The range of materiality allocated across
components was between £88,500 and £1,635,000.
We use performance materiality to reduce to an appr
opriately low
level the probability that the aggr
egate of uncorrected and
undetected misstatements exceeds overall materiality
. Specifically
,
we use performance materiality in deter
mining the scope of our
audit and the nature and extent of our testing of account balances,
classes of transactions and disclosures, for example in determining
sample sizes. Our performance materiality was 75% (2020: 75%) of
overall materiality
, amounting to £1,226,250 (2020: £1,112,250) for
the Group financial statements and £515,000 (2020: £469,000) for
the Company financial statements.
In determining the perfor
mance materiality
, we considered a
number of factors - the history of misstatements, risk assessment
and aggregation risk and the ef
fectiveness of controls - and
concluded that an amount at the upper end of our normal range
was appropriate.
We agr
eed with the Audit Committee that we would report to
them misstatements identified during our audit above £81,750
(Group audit) (2020: £74,150) and £31,700 (Company audit)
(2020: £26,000) as well as misstatements below those amounts
that, in our view
, warranted reporting for qualitative reasons.
Conclusions relating to going concern
Our evaluation of the directors’ assessment of the Gr
oup’
s
and the Company’
s ability to continue to adopt the going
concern basis of accounting included:
•
assessing the inputs and underlying assumptions of the
base case going concern model prepared by management;
•
assessing the downside and upside scenarios which have been
used to sensitise the base case model, including consideration
of the underlying assumptions within each of these for
ecasts;
•
reviewing management’
s analysis of both liquidity and
covenant compliance to ensure ther
e is sufficient liquidity
and no forecast covenant br
eaches over the course of the
Based on the work we have performed, we have not
identified any material uncertainties relating to events or
conditions that, individually or collectively
, may cast significant
doubt on the Group’
s and the Company’
s ability to continue
as a going concern for a period of at least twelve months from
when the financial statements are authorised for issue.
In auditing the financial statements, we have concluded that
the directors’ use of the going concern basis of accounting in
the preparation of the financial statements is appr
opriate.
However
, because not all future events or conditions can be
predicted, this conclusion is not a guarantee as to the Gr
oup’
s
and the Company’
s ability to continue as a going concern.
In relation to the dir
ectors’ reporting on how they have
applied the UK Corporate Governance Code, we have
nothing material to add or draw attention to in relation to the
directors’ statement in the financial statements about whether
the directors consider
ed it appropriate to adopt the going
concern basis of accounting.
Our responsibilities and the r
esponsibilities of the directors
with respect to going concern are described in the r
elevant
sections of this report.
Reporting on other information
The other information comprises all of the infor
mation in the
Annual Report other than the financial statements and our
auditors’ report ther
eon. The directors ar
e responsible for the
other information, which includes reporting based on the T
ask
Force on Climate-r
elated Financial Disclosures (TCFD) r
ec-
ommendations. Our opinion on the financial statements does
not cover the other information and, accordingly
, we do not
express an audit opinion or
, except to the extent otherwise
explicitly stated in this report, any form of assurance thereon.
In connection with our audit of the financial statements, our
responsibility is to r
ead the other information and, in
doing so, consider whether the other information is materially
inconsistent with the financial statements or our knowledge
obtained in the audit, or otherwise appears to be materially